<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://wmug.co.uk/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Lionel's configmgr blog : sccm 2007</title><link>http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/sccm+2007/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: sccm 2007</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>6.x Production</generator><item><title>MSFT May 2012 Security Patch for Silverlight - MS012-034 KB2690729 is replaced by MS012-034 KB2636927</title><link>http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/2012/05/10/msft-may-2012-security-patch-for-silverlight-ms012-034-kb2690729-is-replaced-by-ms012-034-kb2636927.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10c3822e-6a55-4a1a-8d52-5181c69a645b:4382</guid><dc:creator>Lionel</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=4382</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/2012/05/10/msft-may-2012-security-patch-for-silverlight-ms012-034-kb2690729-is-replaced-by-ms012-034-kb2636927.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Had a little discovery today when we realised possibly the fastest replacement of a KB Article ever, (almost instantly!).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-034"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-034&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;It appears that the following behaviour is experienced when you perform a manual installation of MS12-034 for Silverlight:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The critical update KB2636927 updates and patches all Silverlight 5 instances to 5.1.10411.0&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The critical update KB2690729 updates and patches all Silverlight 4 instances to 4.1.10329&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, in WSUS, one observes this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The critical update KB2636927 updates and patches all Silverlight instances&amp;nbsp;as 1 entity (All versions) to 5.1.10411.0&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The critical update KB2690729 is not available in WSUS. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;On the MS12-034 security bulletin &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-034"&gt;page&lt;/a&gt;, you will read that KB2690729 in MS12-034 is replaced by KB2636927.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img height="559" width="948" src="http://wmug.co.uk/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-blogs-components-weblogfiles/00-00-00-00-07-metablogapi/silverlight.JPG" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This then means that any systems with Silverlight managed by WSUS would ultimately still need KB2636927, as it gets evaluated as still needing that since the &amp;#39;older&amp;#39; KB2636927 has already been replaced. That might&amp;nbsp;then suggest why there is only 1 &amp;#39;version&amp;#39; of Silverlight in SUP/WSUS. Therefore, do not be too alarmed if all systems with Silverlight 4 or below are upgraded to 5 after the application of May&amp;#39;s security bundle via Configmgr! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wmug.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4382&amp;AppID=114&amp;AppType=1&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/Configmgr+2007/default.aspx">Configmgr 2007</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/kb2636927/default.aspx">kb2636927</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/kb2690729/default.aspx">kb2690729</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/MS12_2D00_034/default.aspx">MS12-034</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/sccm+2007/default.aspx">sccm 2007</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/security+bulletin/default.aspx">security bulletin</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/silverlight/default.aspx">silverlight</category></item><item><title>There's something about "Side by Side" KB2507938...</title><link>http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/2011/07/20/there-s-something-about-quot-side-by-side-quot-kb2507938.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10c3822e-6a55-4a1a-8d52-5181c69a645b:4170</guid><dc:creator>Lionel</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=4170</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/2011/07/20/there-s-something-about-quot-side-by-side-quot-kb2507938.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Some knowledge in case you experience these issues. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2507938"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2507938&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After the installation of the security update, several&amp;nbsp;windows&amp;nbsp;adminstrators&amp;nbsp;have&amp;nbsp;noticed entries into event&amp;nbsp;viewer that indicate&amp;nbsp;that a&amp;nbsp;SideBySide error has occured for conhost.exe whenever&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;command prompt window is opened. This only occurs on Windows 7&amp;nbsp;and Windows Server 2008 R2. Although it may appear to flood the event viewer&amp;nbsp;with multiple error 33s especially on servers utilising the command prompt, Microsoft has informed that this error does not affect the command prompt window functionality and can be ignored. Upgrading to Windows 7 SP1 is also a potential option if the situation permits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UPDATE - 18 August 2011&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is now resolved by Microsoft when applying the August Security updates. The patch that fixes this is below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2567680"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2567680&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wmug.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4170&amp;AppID=114&amp;AppType=1&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/conhost-exe/default.aspx">conhost.exe</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/July+2011+security+patches/default.aspx">July 2011 security patches</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/KB2507938/default.aspx">KB2507938</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/sccm+2007/default.aspx">sccm 2007</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/sidebyside/default.aspx">sidebyside</category></item><item><title>Using SCCM to manage clients in a workgroup or untrusted domain (DMZ etc..)</title><link>http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/2011/05/04/using-sccm-to-manage-clients-in-a-workgroup-or-untrusted-domain-dmz-etc.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 06:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10c3822e-6a55-4a1a-8d52-5181c69a645b:4120</guid><dc:creator>Lionel</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=4120</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/2011/05/04/using-sccm-to-manage-clients-in-a-workgroup-or-untrusted-domain-dmz-etc.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Many people do struggle a little (maybe!)&amp;nbsp;when coming to configuring and managing SCCM clients in a workgroup, DMZ, untrusted domain. Many big words, jargons are thrown around, LMHosts, Registry keys, SRV records, DNS Suffixes and the list goes on!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Found this extremely useful if you need to obtain and find out more information... The what ifs and know hows, limitations,&amp;nbsp;considerations and requirements, sums it up up nicely in one place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Credits to Clifton Hughes for getting this done. 5 stars!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/using-configmgr-2007-to-manage-clients-in-a-workgroup-or-un-trusted-domain.aspx"&gt;http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/using-configmgr-2007-to-manage-clients-in-a-workgroup-or-un-trusted-domain.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wmug.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4120&amp;AppID=114&amp;AppType=1&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/sccm+2007/default.aspx">sccm 2007</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/sccm+client/default.aspx">sccm client</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/untrusted+domain/default.aspx">untrusted domain</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/workgroup/default.aspx">workgroup</category></item><item><title>Checking Patch Statuses through WMI</title><link>http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/2011/05/02/checking-patch-statuses-through-wmi.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 09:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">10c3822e-6a55-4a1a-8d52-5181c69a645b:4112</guid><dc:creator>Lionel</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=4112</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/2011/05/02/checking-patch-statuses-through-wmi.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;Normally the optimal and quickest way to determine if a patch has definitely been installed on a system is to use WMI. That&amp;#39;s where the SCCM client primarily gets its information from to report back to its parent. There are several ways you can go about but the ways i&amp;#39;ve found to be ideal for me are described below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Through the command prompt:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;On the system which you wish to query, open up command prompt&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;Run &amp;quot;Wmic /namespace:\\root\ccm\softwareupdates\updatesstore path CCM_UpdateStatus get status, Article, Bulletin, UniqueId&amp;quot; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;This will show you ALL updates on the particular system. I&amp;#39;ve added additional information for reference but you can always play around with what you wish to see returned.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;This is best for an overview and you can quickly do a &lt;em&gt;find or filter &lt;/em&gt;to determine a patch status if you pipe it to a txt file. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Through the Wbemtest User Interface:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;Start &amp;quot;WBEMTEST&amp;quot; from a run prompt &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;Connect to the namespace &amp;quot;\\&amp;lt;computername&amp;gt;\root\ccm\softwareupdates\updatesstore&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;Select the Query button and using WQL, create a statement that suits your needs. Some examples are below:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;Searching for a Missing Patch that is for Web Components would be:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;select * from ccm_updatestatus where status = &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; and title like &amp;quot;%web%&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;Searching for all installed patches would be:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;select * from ccm_updatestatus where status = &amp;#39;installed&amp;#39;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p style="PADDING-LEFT:30px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img height="375" width="462" src="http://wmug.co.uk/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-blogs-components-weblogfiles/00-00-00-00-07-metablogapi/wmi.JPG" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Depending on your requirements / needs, have fun! Wbemtest is very useful for quick references to WMI to determine patch statuses whenever you are suspecting the integrity of data received from SCCM due to possible sync issues. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wmug.co.uk/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4112&amp;AppID=114&amp;AppType=1&amp;ContentType=0" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/CCM_5F00_UpdateStatus/default.aspx">CCM_UpdateStatus</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/sccm+2007/default.aspx">sccm 2007</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/Software+Updates/default.aspx">Software Updates</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/Wbemtest/default.aspx">Wbemtest</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/wmi/default.aspx">wmi</category><category domain="http://wmug.co.uk/wmug/b/orientalcrusher/archive/tags/wql/default.aspx">wql</category></item></channel></rss>